Tuesday, July 31, 2012

The Dark Knight Falls


Before I begin:  What I am going to be writing here is very different from my 'normal' 'reviews' and is more along the lines of a list of things that bothered me about Christopher Nolan's final film in his Batman trilogy, The Dark Knight Rises. I also want to state that I actually liked the film overall.  Which is scary after all of it's brutal flaws.  I guess certain actors just carried the film for me, while others (including the director) did their best to ruin it.  To be honest, had the first two movies in the film not been so terrific and flowed through the scenes with such a sense of fluidity, then I probably wouldn't have felt the need to post such a list.  However, Nolan set a precedent with his other films, and while the film was impressive in it's own right, it truly missed the bar on many levels.  Here are some of my biggest problems/inconsistencies with the film...

  • Time frame - the entire bomb sequence in the later half of the film, starting from the football scene up until the explosion, was completely discombobulated.  Certain aspects of the film take longer than they should, while others seemed to occur way too fast.  I will elaborate on these more throughout the list, but for now just keep this idea in mind.
  • Injuries - Batman apparently can barely walk in the beginning of the film.  Okay…why?  During the moving it is claimed that the last time confirmed sighting of batman was the night that Harvey Dent died.  If I remember correctly, Batman was seen running away from a pack of dogs and police in an effort to escape.  He seemed pretty fine to me there and if that was his last time out as the Batman then what on earth happened?  Did Alfred break his leg to stop him from going out again to fight crime? Bruce also somehow creates this thing on his leg in a matter of moments that makes him strong enough to break a brick wall. Well that is awesome…bravo.  Now, why have you been waiting 8 years to do something that ‘seemingly’ takes no time at all and makes you able to walk like the 30-40 year old man that you are at this point?  Lastly, Bruce gets his back broken and heals in a record amount of time by a simple punch from an old man and also somehow doesn’t die (or even get hurt for that matter) every time he jumps and hangs himself trying to get out of the prison. 
  • Travel - How on earth does he get back into Gotham City after the Bane locks it down.  I understand that he is “Batman” but he doesn’t get in as Batman; he enters as Bruce Wayne.  Let’s also not forget that he somehow gets across the world with no money or resources and without letting anyone on to his whereabouts.  (Don’t you think that if anyone actually saw him they would think to themselves… “Hey…that’s Bruce Wayne.  He lives in Gotham, how did he get out?”)
  • Bane fights Batman.  Bane reveals Batman’s identity to Catwoman, and many of his other guards.  Bane defeats Batman and removes his mask.  Countless people (mainly guards) now know that Batman is Bruce Wayne.  Many also know that he is either in prison, in a wheelchair from watching Bane break his back, or dead.  So please…Christopher Nolan…explain that when Bruce Wayne gets back into Gotham, and is purposely captured by some of Bane’s guards, that there isn’t a completely insane reaction from any of the guards that he has shown up?  This makes absolutely no sense. 
  • Miranda Tate/Talia is completely ridiculous in this story.  Why butcher a very deep character and turn her into a senseless killer out for revenge.  Her and Bruce are supposed to have a meaningful relationship and they even have a kid.  At one point Bane says “He will come for her”.  Why?  There was never any real developed relationship between the two.  They just had one night together…and Bruce Wayne has had hundreds of one nights with women.  She really did nothing to stand out whatsoever.  Now I know that this is Nolan’s Batman.  That makes sense because this is his version of the well known and established superhero.  But why do I feel like I just don’t care about Talia, the random board members who take charge in this film, or the hothead beat cop (Robin).
  • Robin - Please just stop.  Take this out of the film.  It is completely ridiculous and nonsensical.  First of all…how could he ever be ‘Robin’ if his name is Robin?  Who wouldn’t guess that it was him? Second, how is John Blake short for Robin?  The character in the film says to Blake that he should use his full name…not his original name.  Please explain how this makes any sense.  Oh, and one more thing.  How does he have ridiculous intuition?  Really…a smile gave away that Bruce Wayne was Batman…really.  Do ex-cops normally going swinging from a rope like Tarzan randomly into a waterfall in hopes that they won’t smash into a wall and die instantaneously.  Well he is Joseph Gordon-Levitt…and he can do nothing wrong in the eyes of well…everyone...so I guess its fine.
  • Bruce’s fingerprints being stolen made him lose like 25 million in the stock market.  At some point in the series he had about 50 million.  I could be very off about this but just bare with me.  He lost about half of it on the renewable energy thing that he created.  That would leave him with about 25 million.  Someone explain to me how if someone takes my fingerprints I can go into millions of dollars in debt better on stock futures.  Oh, and where can I park my motorcycle if I decide to head down to Wall Street and do some trading to try and make my money back. 
  • Inception? – Did Bruce really escape a nuclear like bomb or do Caine and Nolan just love inception so much that they figured they had to do another level of dreaming in this film as well.
  • James Gordon (Gary Oldman) – Commissioner Gordon was quite possibly the best character in the entire series.  Nolan actually tried to play down the character's overall dedication and faithfulness to the force in this film.  Somehow JGL is the one on top with that little one liner “hands look pretty dirty to me”.  What a joke…what an insult to the character, the actor, and the fans. 
  • Joker-  First of all I want to start by saying that I can only imagine the pain and suffering of the friends and family of Heath Ledger following his death.  It is sad when anyone dies in this world and even more so when it is a well liked and very talented man such as Ledger.  However, to completely remove the Joker from the third film is probably the most outrageous thing I have ever seen in film making.  In The Dark Knight, the Joker is made out to be the most intense and unforgiving villain to ever grace the streets of Gotham.  It suited that character well because it is well known that Batman's greatest foe has always been the unforgettable Joker.  I’m curious though…did we all take crazy pills before seeing this last film in the trilogy.  Are we really supposed to believe that the Joker just vanished/ran away after the last film?  Okay…well thank you Nolan, you just completely ruined the character and disgraced the entire series.  Batman has been doing nothing for almost a decade…what the hell happened to the Joker?  Maybe he just stayed in prison this time.  Wait, didn’t all the prisoners get released…Oops.  Well he was a villain from another movie and he really didn’t fit into this storyline.  Wait, Scarecrow was in this film…Oops.  What a joke.  The actor who played the Joker did die…but the character did not.
I just want to point out again that I actually enjoyed the film.  I really just don't understand how we are all supposed to be okay with the Joker being completely absent even in a flashback scene or something.  He did kill the girl that Bruce Wayne loved.  Shouldn't we have seen or heard something about him during Wayne's agonizing?  It would have been the same situation if Michael Caine died of old age and then there was just no Alfred in the final film...lame.

Bane's voice...lame, loud, and sounded like a megaphone.

After all the senseless killing in the film, Nolan's liberties with certain characters and his casting, and a very odd aspect of the entire film where a character (Lucius Fox) ran Wayne's company...when he claimed that he was resigning at the end of the last film.  Did Nolan ever even watch the second film and if so does he realize that many people either saw a triple feature of all three films or watched the prequels at home before the final movie?  

Movies that I liked better than The Dark Knight Rises:
  • Batman Begins
  • Superman Returns
  • The Amazing Spider-Man

Sunday, July 8, 2012

The Amazing Spider-Man

The first thing that must be said about The Amazing Spider-Man is that you must view this film on it's own accord to see how spectacular it truly is.  The second thing that must be said about the film is that it must be viewed in comparison to the other films in the Spider-Man franchise, as well as every other comic book film, to see its faults.  Now I can imagine that those two concepts sound very conflicting, and in fact they may seem like exact opposites.  Essentially, that is what I was going for with those statements.  I believe that there are definitely two factions amongst moviegoers (both frequent and casual) who are both on completely opposing sides of the spectrum when it comes to loving or hating the new Spider-Man film.  One group are classified as those who hate the idea of there being a new Spider-man film so shortly after the last trilogy had ended.  The other group, who apparently have shown themselves to be much more dominate in the box office, are those who had such a bitter hatred for Spider-Man 3 that they welcomed Mark Webb's taking over a reboot of the series.  Truthfully, there are so many reasons why each side has come to their respective conclusions...but I am going to do my best to bring to light a few aspects of each of the film series to help people better understand the issues at hand.



Sam Raimi's Spider-Man
  • Following the success of the X-Men film, Marvel Studies went on to produce Spider-Man.  The film completely revamped the superhero film genre and set the standard for many films to come.  
  • Also like the X-Men film series, the Spider-Man series delivered quite possibly one of the most successful sequels (at the time...obv Dark Knight, Iron Man 2, etc were more successful).
  • Surprisingly, Spider-Man's third movie in the series also delivered what is arguably considered one of the worst experiences in a comic book sequel.  (X-Men: The Last Stand may have that crown.  The final film needed less dancing from Peter, more Venom, and a revamped Harry Osborn that didn't ride a surfboard like glider.)
  • Tobey Maguire was a terrific Spider-man and embodied the character exactly as I had imagined he would be on screen.  Aside from his very abnormal appearance in the final film, there really isn't anything bad to say about him.
  • The villains in the films (mainly The Green Goblin and Doctor Octopus) set the standard for future generations of villains on screen.  Willem Dafoe will always remain in my mind as the best way of depicting the character.  Alfred Molina played an exceptional role as well, truly embodying the role of Doctor Octopus while also taking his own spin on the character.  The Sandman was also an excellent villain choice for the third film, and to be honest, had the film not been so horribly received I am sure that Thomas Haden Church would have garnered much more attention for his role in the film.
  • Lastly, I want to point out the the supporting characters that stood out in this series.  Aunt May, MJ, Harry, Dr. Connors, and most importantly J. Jonah Jameson (J. K. Simmons was hilarious as the editor in chief at the Daily Bugle.  This magnificent casting of one of both Peter Parker and Spider-Man's most important villains could not have been more perfect.  His absence from the new movie can only be described as a tribute to J. K. Simmons).
  • There is so much more to say about this film series that has been completely butchered by my lack of detail, as well as the obvious lack of care from all comic book fans following the reboot, that the trilogy is really not receiving the credit it deserves here.


Mark Webb's Amazing Spider-Man
  • The overall casting of this film was beyond perfect.  There truly wasn't an actor out of place during any part of the film.  (Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Denis Leary, with Martin Sheen, and Sally Field just to name a few).  I actually really enjoyed seeing a new take on the character of Spider-Man.  However, I realized something upon finishing the movie that struck me as very odd.  I honestly did not care at all about the character.  I cared about what was going to happen to the Lizard, and I was worried about Aunt May, Gwen and even Captain Stacy.  I really just had no love for spider-man in this film.  The last series really made us feel the struggles Peter Parker was going through.  There were motivational quotes, dramatic scenes, and intense emotions that flowed out through the film.  I felt none of that in this film...and that is it's biggest fault. (They even needed a final scene to try and make you care about Peter Parker/his family...which still had little to no effect.)
  • Remember how I said that the casting for this film was perfect?  Well it was...considering the fact that they obviously couldn't cast anyone from the last series in this one.  I seriously believe that Tobey Maguire played a better Spider-man than Andrew Garfield.  I also believe that it is completely lame how Mark Webb used the basis for some of the characters from the last series to streamline the audience right into relationships with the characters.  Really...you are using the Lizard...the villain that Sam Raimi built up to for the previous two Spider-Man films?
  • Do gentlemen really prefer blondes?  I can't say for sure...but it seems that Spider-Man does.  However, I liked Kirsten Dunst as MJ in the first Spider-Man so much more than Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy in Amazing.  Now I know these are completely different characters, but honestly, I preferred Bryce Dallas Howard's performance as Gwen in Spider-Man 3 over Emma Stone's performance as well.  Flat out...she is a better actor than Emma Stone in my opinion.
  • New York City looked a lot better in Raimi's trilogy.  The Amazing Spider-Man was a little too dark to see how beautiful the city can truly be.  It also made the main villain a little difficult to spot since he is dark green.  (Yes, I would have preferred a lab coat as opposed to the naked lizard we received)
  • It was honestly a little too soon to make a reboot of the series.  It would be comparable to rebooting Iron man in 3 years...get the point?) 
  • The Amazing Spider-Man was not a family movie.  Spider-Man (2002) was a lot of family fun and was a movie that could be enjoyed by all ages.  However, this movie is definitely fan service and not successful in sincerely being the best option for all viewers. 
  • Lastly, it was smart of the new film to not go with Norman Osborn as the main villain in this film.  Just as Batman Begins waited until the second film to bring back the Joker, The Amazing Spider-Man played things smart by sticking away from contesting with the talent of Willem Dafoe. 
Conclusions 
I am going to tell you the one thing that you have been waiting to hear/read since you saw this...GO SEE THIS FILM.  It truly is an amazing movie as the title says, but that doesn't make it free from criticism just because it is a reboot of a series.  Also, just because Spider-Man 3 was not the best comic book film of all time, it should not damaged the reputation of the other films to the point of being forgotten.  There were some memorable performances in Raimi's trilogy.  (Bruce Campbell was also hilarious in all three films...and let us not forget Macho Man, R.I.P. ...) 






There is much more that needs to be said but I will leave you with this...
Give the new movie a chance, but don't forget the old trilogy either.